CENSORED on Some thoughts on the Rolling Stones in Cuba – Mail Online – Peter Hitchens blog

March 28, 2016 – I  left this comment here: Leninism and Lennonism aren’t that far apart. Some thoughts on the Rolling Stones in Cuba. – Mail Online – Peter Hitchens blog – which was CENSORED.

Dear Mr. Hitchens,

While I sometimes greatly appreciate reading your views and social criticisms, here is one topic where we are at the very opposites.

As I commented in none other than the “Rolling Stones” magazine (http://www.rollingstone.com/music/live-reviews/rolling-stones-thrill-huge-crowd-at-historic-havana-show-20160326?page=2), of course, with the easing of the embargo and whatever else is thawing, the Rolling Stones, icons of some of the worse cultural trash in the West just had to go do a concert in Cuba.

The Western MSM hailed this as progress. Progress means having some of England’s crappiest people, four lousy musicians, drug addicts, and sexuality pigs unload their garbage on the Cuban people. They just have to come destroy everything that is good in Cuba. Let us take a moment to ask: When did the Rolling Stones do anything that is considered good from a social or political perspective?

Next, you ask, “Could it be that money and logistics played a part? ”

Indeed, when has money not played a part in every evil deed by wily, devoid of ethics Westerners proclaiming to be for “freedom and democracy” in every country they have set foot to ruin and destroy? Take a look at what the US and capitalism have done to Latin American – the profound malaise, the gangs, the drugs, the murders, the poverty, the sexual abuse, the disease epidemics – for millions, it’s hell on earth.

Regarding one of your questions, I came across this tid bit in the media: En su web, la banda reveló: “Este evento está siendo posible gracias a la beneficencia de la Fundación Bon Intenshon…”. Detrás de esa fundación está el empresario Gregory Elias, promotor de un festival de jazz en Curazao y presidente de United Trust, una importante asesoría del paraíso fiscal caribeño.

Apparently it wasn’t the Stones who paid for their unfortunate visit to Cuba.

Could it be, lordie, lordie, that United Trust is a tax evasion/corruption consultancy? Maybe providing money laundering services as well? The Stones are so trashy they can’t even come to Cuba on a clean ticket… I’m surprised they weren’t sponsored by the Hillary Mafia Foundation…

And United Trust – why does that sound familiar? Ah, yes! United Fruit…

The pests are back!

And next time you want to mention torture, why don’t you mention how the CIA monstrously tortured – yes, go into the details – and murdered thousands of innocent Latin Americans in ways that make Castro look like an altar boy?

Lastly, Mr. Hitchens, I’m sure you will allow this to go through moderation, you who love to go off criticizing those awful repressive regimes where no criticism is allowed by those who control public discussion – lest you be cut from the same cloth?

___________________________

ADDED on March 29, 2016.

As of today, my comment above has remained censored on Peter Hitchens’ blog/Mail on Sunday site.

See, “freedom and democracy” is a system where it’s proponents never allow anyone to debate them in public. Then they point fingers are Putin, Castro, and whoever for repressing criticism…

 

Unable to post comment about Hildabeast Clinton on Rawstory

In response to one more filthy rich Hillary shill, avowing by heaven and earth that the evil witch is honest – these people just spit the lies out like popcorn – my comment was censored.

This may shock you: Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest

No, it won’t shock us because corrupt, shameless, wealthy Dems will say anything to get their louse elected.
And this was my censored comment:

And maybe, just maybe Rawstory is now pushing Hildabeast because Sanders keeps showing he has a better chance to beat Trump or Cruz…

_____________________

We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by Raw Story. Find out more.

CENSORED/blocked on The Telegraph www.telegraph.co.uk

My comment below couldn’t be posted to this article at the Telegraph:

Donald Trump is the Republican Hillary Clinton: an epic fraud. Please vote for anyone else

The presidency of the United States is supposed to a moral pulpit. Donald Trump is not fit to stand in it

My comment:

Since Hillary has 30 years of criminal activity with Bill, plus the bribes (“speaker fees and that money-laundering foundation of theirs), plus all of Bill’s sex horror stories, including Epstein’s pedophile island – let’s just hope whoever it is will expose her until November. The rest doesn’t matter, because aside from Sanders, they are all crooks and mass murder neocons. But Sanders has no chance – in part, thanks to low info voters, including those of varied colors, stupid enough to vote for corrupt establishment Hillary

Their message: We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by Telegraph. Find out more.