My comment below couldn’t be posted to this article at the Telegraph:
Donald Trump is the Republican Hillary Clinton: an epic fraud. Please vote for anyone else
The presidency of the United States is supposed to a moral pulpit. Donald Trump is not fit to stand in it
Since Hillary has 30 years of criminal activity with Bill, plus the bribes (“speaker fees and that money-laundering foundation of theirs), plus all of Bill’s sex horror stories, including Epstein’s pedophile island – let’s just hope whoever it is will expose her until November. The rest doesn’t matter, because aside from Sanders, they are all crooks and mass murder neocons. But Sanders has no chance – in part, thanks to low info voters, including those of varied colors, stupid enough to vote for corrupt establishment Hillary
Their message: We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by Telegraph. Find out more.
The Spectator has an article depicting the ignorant-on-psychology approach that some conservatives spouse:
It’s not church doctrine on marriage that needs to change. It’s almost everything else
This explains why my comment to the above article was censored:
When you are completely ignorant about treating psychological problems, like the Church often is, and so is the Spectator crowd, you are going spout this non-sense that homosexuals have nothing to treat and should go about their lives with their minds deformed. This creates the problem that every kind of homosexual perversion is normalized in their minds and many will effectively insult and sexually harass others because of their homosexuality, along with worse crimes. The dominant discourse will always be “what a cross LGBTs have to bear”, not “let’s inquire about why they experience all kinds of perverted sexual feelings towards people of the same sex”. People who are ignorant about human psychology simply cannot answer or investigate the question. Hence the idiotic stance that results from these conservatives.
Last but not least, I know I’m not the only one, but sometimes, when I read such aberrant articles, I feel like the only person who realizes that these so-called Christian/Catholics interpret the Bible any way they want, and then say the Bible is the word of God – and so it must be true. It would be nice to tap on their shoulder and ask, ‘Haven’t you noticed that every century you have changed the discourse and every time you still proclaim your version is the “word of God”? Cute game, isn’t it?’
This is particularly true of this “we can’t turn away the gays because I love them so much and they’re so nice to me” crowd like Hitchens. “I must have them so near to me in my heart, because I’m such a good little Catholic. And tell me once again how beautiful homosexuality is, Shaw, how utterly nice homosexuals are. It makes me drool. I really want to know how another man would worship me, how he struggles with it, how he’d like to be best friends with me forever. It’s not an abomination at all – who could ever think that, Shaw? I’m just doing my Catholic duty to be good here.”
Really, with “Catholics” like this, who needs GLAAD?