CENSORED: comment about article on porn on Ethika Politika (Arrested Development: The Destruction Of Masculinity In A Pornified Culture) by Octavia Ratiu

CENSORED: my comment about article on porn on Ethika Politika “Arrested Development: The Destruction Of Masculinity In A Pornified Culture” by | October 23, 2014

The CENSORED comment:

I very much appreciate and support EP’s continued articles to criticize porn. Well done.

My comment to this article, which has many good points, and we need more of, is that it’s too focused on a narrow construct (male viewer/female sex object). Porn poisons the brain and psychology of women just as it does for men. Also, there was no mention of homosexual porn and other perverse kinds of sexuality. I have no doubt that porn reinforces for quite a bit of women who have a heterosexual psychology, along with other factors, a perverted way of thinking about women due to porn. That is, they receive varied messages that thinking of women sexually is acceptable, desirable, and tiltillating – the normalization of homosexuality and bisexuality. Thus they end up gazing at women in porn in the same top-down exploitative position that male viewers of porn are in.

For many women, who have long lost or never had a psychology of respect and dignity, but are much more involved in dynamics of power regarding sexuality, porn is the kind of content that gives them a green light to sexually harass or make unwanted advances towards other women to pursue in the real world what they like to see on screen. And where have you ever seen a homosexual man railing against porn and homosexuals involved in porn? One more piece of evidence of what garbage of people LGBTs are.

Censorship at National Review Online – NRO – all my comments deleted re “More on Houston’s Harassment of Pastors/Annise Parker”

Here are the comments that the moderator deleted on the threads of a couple of articles related to Mayor Parker (or should we say Porker?) at National Review Online – NRO. All my comments at NRO are being systematically deleted.

More on Houston’s Harassment of Pastors

======================

on National Review Online

Alessandra 3 days ago Removed

I’d prefer ppl spent their time and energy initiating the legal procedure to impeach the nasty Parker from office, since she is clearly unfit to be Houston’s mayor.

===========

The Real Victim of Houston Pastor Story: Annise Parker

Alessandra 3 days ago Removed

Niyol
‏@niyol_biligaana

@Alessandra_Ref – we shall not stand 4 gov control of our churches. Parker must resign. Contact mayor mayor@houstontx.gov, call 713-837-0311

=================

Alessandra 3 days ago Removed

Aside from venting on the Internet, conservatives need to ask themselves
what can they do concretely to culturally slap back this disgusting
perverted woman who is now mayor of Houston and anyone else who
normalizes homosexuality. The problem many conservatives have not
realized is that LGBTs don’t want tolerance, they want domination and
control of society – and they will destroy our fundamental rights, and
will not bat an eye in the process, while claiming it’s more than
justified. So, 1) political action of all kinds to fight against liberal
politicians and political action 2) work to defeat new “sexual
orientation discrimination” bills and to repeal all such laws across the
US 3) do not employ any LGBT or person who is adamant about normalizing
homosexuality – you are only giving power and money to people who wish
to destroy you, your rights, marriage, a sexually healthy society, and
who will force you to submit to their nasty homosexuality agenda -or
suffer persecution – legal, social, financial, religious, cultural, and
personal.

===========

Alessandra 3 days ago Removed

Every LGBT pervert is normal in their own mind

=============

Normalization of homosexuality or freedom of conscience/religion – choose one

=============

Alessandra 3 days ago Removed

Does it have to do with thinking that homosexuality is normal in Denmark and electing a homosexual pervert for mayor?

============

 

CENSORED – all my comments about the UK Rotherham scandal censored at the National Review Online

AT the time the scandal broke (so around Sept 2014), I read and commented about the scandal at several sites. NRO was one of them. They deleted (censored) all my comments. Here are the comments copied from disqus, which doesn’t post the exact date of the comment, but the date relevant to today (stupid way of doing it!):

You commented · a month ago   Removed:

A point made by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph:
“Two years ago I reported on how Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for
Rochdale, disclosed in the Commons something of the horrors that had
been going on in his constituency, where social workers had encouraged
the mass-rape of underage girls in “care”, on the grounds that it was
merely their “life choice” to become prostitutes.”

At 11, 12, and 13 years of age! Having come from broken homes and
de-stabilizing environments, and all sorts of abusive histories.

These workers are the same garbage of people who think homosexuality,
pornography, and loveless sex is normal and who want to shove this
horrendous liberal ideology down everyone’s throats. And who now control
most social work and psychology/psychiatric institutions. They are
corrupt to the core. It is a disgrace how degenerate and smug and snotty
they have become at the same time.

And let us not forget England’s favorite homosexual pedophile activist, Peter Tatchell, who has fervently campaigned,
along with all his other monstrous homosexual and liberal pals, for
lowering the age of consent laws in the UK to 14, before they eliminate
limits all together. And why? Because he says that’s “how society will protect children from abuse.“

Look at what this liberal discourse has done to lives of hundreds of
children: it’s profoundly contributed to and often ensured their
neglect, their abandonment by workers and police when they were being
terrorized, exploited, and abused, who dismissed it all as these kids
making “choices” and having greater “sexual freedom.”

What kind of a society even listens to such a grotesque individual as
Tatchell? Why isn’t he branded and shunned for what he truly is? A
vile, homosexual pedophile piece of crap.

===========

 

 

  • And let us not forget England’s favorite homosexual pedophile activist, Peter Tatchell, who has fervently campaigned, along with all his other monstrous homosexual and liberal pals, for lowering the age of consent laws in the UK to 14, before they eliminate limits all together. And why? Because he says that’s “how society will protect children from abuse.”

    Look at what this liberal discourse has done to lives of hundreds of
    children: it’s profoundly contributed to and often ensured their
    neglect, their abandonment by workers and police when they were being
    terrorized, exploited, and abused, who dismissed it all as these kids
    making “choices” and having greater “sexual freedom.”

    What kind of a society even listens to such a grotesque individual as
    Tatchell? Why isn’t he branded and shunned for what he truly is? A
    vile, homosexual pedophile piece of crap.

  • You commented · a month ago   Removed:

    Why doesn’t the public in England put pressure on its politicians to take harsh action in this matter?

    Laws can be changed (as in mandatory reporting, safeguarding for
    whistle blowers, harsher penalties for abusers, building shelters and
    special police departments for abuse victims, etc), many more direct
    perpetrators could go to prison if re-investigations were done, and all the politicians, police, and care workers who somehow covered up or colluded with the perpetrators could also go to prison.

    And even if the current English law structure doesn’t allow for the
    imprisonment of civil servants – and what kind of a country is England
    if that is the case ? – than at least these people could remain
    unemployed for the rest of their lives and shunned from society – as
    their punishment for willingly cooperating in the abuse and destruction
    of countless, vulnerable young lives.

    There is a lot that could be done legally, politically, and socially –
    but it seems that England is so corrupt that no one stands up for
    anything, even in the face of what is most evil about the country.

    You commented · a month ago   Removed:

    Let us not forget that England is the country where Owen John and his wife Eunice were denied by the state to be foster parents because they had a decent, moral, and healthy view of sexuality and were therefore painted as unfit human beings by the liberal childcare system – this while atrocious liberals who think homosexuality and porn are normal and are involved in this scandal let children be abused right and left while doing nothing.

    If any of these 1,400 Rotherham children had been placed with the
    John’s, they would have found a safe, loving home, and would have never
    been exploited or abused. But no, the Johns were branded criminals and
    horrible people by these disgusting liberal “social workers” with their
    nasty and destructive homosexuality agenda.

    What was the John’s crime? Having decent and have wholesome minds
    about sexuality. Providing a safe and loving home to needy children,
    giving them a moral and ethical upbringing, teaching them a healthy
    outlook on sexuality and relationships, exemplified by their own
    lifelong behaviors.

    This is what is wrong with the UK today. These are the garbage,
    irresponsible, fanatical people who infest the social work and
    psychology fields.

=============

 

  • You commented · a month ago   Removed:

    How can people ask for the mere resignation of police and child care
    services chiefs, when what they did deserves long prison sentences?

  • You commented · a month ago   Removed:

    modern Britain is all about exacerbated individualism and most people
    don’t care about anyone but themselves (or their immediate family), they
    have no sense of responsibility towards anyone else, and they will turn
    their backs on every social problem

  • You commented · a month ago   Removed:

    I wonder if the homosexual pedophiles who abused the smaller number of
    boys in Rotherham will be marching down the next Pride Parade in
    England… and how many liberals will clap at them

  • You commented · a month ago   Removed:

    C. Booker from The Telegraph wrote : “Two years ago I reported on how Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale, disclosed in the Commons something of the horrors that had been going on in his constituency, where social workers had encouraged the mass-rape of underage girls in “care”, on the grounds that it was merely their “life choice” to become prostitutes.”

    These are the same garbage of people who think homosexuality, pornography, and loveless sex is normal and who want to shove this horrendous liberal ideology down everyone’s throats. And who now control most social work and psychology/psychiatric institutions. They are corrupt to the core. It is a disgrace how degenerate and smug
    and snotty they have become at the same time.

  • You commented · a month ago   Removed:

    Let us not forget that England is the country where Owen John and his
    wife were denied by the state to be foster parents because they had a
    decent, moral, and healthy view of sexuality and where therefore painted
    as unfit human beings by the liberal childcare system – while the dung
    of liberals who think homosexuality and porn are normal and are involved
    in this scandal let children be abused right and left while doing
    nothing.

  • You commented · a month ago   Removed:

    Does England have a single individual who is not corrupt to the core and thus willing to put in prison the various politicians, police chiefs and staff, and child care workers who allowed this abuse to happen and who tried covering it up for years? Because so far, all I see is a lot of talk but no consequences.

    The British media is also highly to blame. Most editors censor and dismiss such investigations and articles – because they are so progressive, you know? Like the BBC, the Guardian, they sit there all day calling themselves “progressives” while colluding in silence with just about every sexual abuse perpetrator.

    Where was the liberal media on this? Printing articles promoting porn,
    homosexuality, and casual sex as normal for the past 30 decades, that’s
    where. And attacking social conservatives as h8ters.

    garbage of people.

    ===================