I have been blocked on The Atlantic, but it happened some time ago. I was too busy to post the comment(s) here.
So today I tried posting again:
The only candidate that is against the current corrupt election system is Sanders
Automatic response:
We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by The Atlantic. Find out more.
Another comment censored – this one responding to PRI’s article (Public Radio International):
In the era of globalized trade, there are few things Westerners can’t outsource. The clothes on our backs are made in Bangladesh. The gadgets we adore? China. Our morning dose of coffee comes from Brazil, Vietnam and beyond.
Even Western babies can be nurtured in the bellies of foreign women — each one paid to endure pregnancy and the pangs of childbirth. Those arrangements, facilitated by the global surrogacy industry, have boomed in the past decade.
But there are signs that this trade in surrogate services is up against a formidable backlash.
Here’s the comment that I left – it was based on this post over at Alessandra Reflections:
Look at this case (Gay parents fight for custody with surrogate in Thailand – Ruth Sherlock, Washington – TheTelegraph UK). Not only at the case, but also how it’s framed by Western media.
It’s about two grotesque homosexual pigs who wanted to use a Thai
woman as a mule for carrying a baby that they were then going to take
away from the mother at the end – that is, surrogacy:
The Telegraph then reports that the Thai mother gave birth, but now
thinking of the well-being and the human rights of the baby, refused to
sign off the baby.
So the homosexual pigs stole the baby from the surrogate mother and
went into “hiding” – whatever that means.
They criminally stole the baby from its real mother. Who did not want
to part with the baby. But the case is even more complicated, because
this Thai woman just carried the baby, since the egg for the baby came
from an anonymous woman!
All because these turds of homosexuals refuse to go deal with their
profoundly deformed psychologies and treat their sexuality problems.
In other words, as other people have remarked, the rich West has now
gone beyond treating third world people like dogs merely for cheap
labor, they must now colonize the wombs of these unfortunate women, and
make them into mules for carrying the babies that they are too perverted
to conceive through a healthy man-woman relationship.
Lastly, look at the framing by the wealthy Western media – who’s portrayed as the victim? The two privileged homosexual pigs.
I hope the Thai government will not be bought by these two gay turds.
Alas, as we all know, money does speak loudly in a poor country. And
women and children have no fundamental human rights if there’s a gay or
lesbian pig wailing about something they want. In Western liberalism, is
there a right for a baby girl to have a mother? Never if homosexual
pigs are involved. All that matters is that she be given things (money),
which the two homosexual pigs have.
A new chapter of how nasty neo-colonization is: now at the level of a poor woman’s womb.
Alessandra Reflections blog
_________________________
And it was CENSORED.
March 28, 2016 – I left this comment here: Leninism and Lennonism aren’t that far apart. Some thoughts on the Rolling Stones in Cuba. – Mail Online – Peter Hitchens blog – which was CENSORED.
Dear Mr. Hitchens,
While I sometimes greatly appreciate reading your views and social criticisms, here is one topic where we are at the very opposites.
As I commented in none other than the “Rolling Stones” magazine (http://www.rollingstone.com/music/live-reviews/rolling-stones-thrill-huge-crowd-at-historic-havana-show-20160326?page=2), of course, with the easing of the embargo and whatever else is thawing, the Rolling Stones, icons of some of the worse cultural trash in the West just had to go do a concert in Cuba.
The Western MSM hailed this as progress. Progress means having some of England’s crappiest people, four lousy musicians, drug addicts, and sexuality pigs unload their garbage on the Cuban people. They just have to come destroy everything that is good in Cuba. Let us take a moment to ask: When did the Rolling Stones do anything that is considered good from a social or political perspective?
Next, you ask, “Could it be that money and logistics played a part? ”
Indeed, when has money not played a part in every evil deed by wily, devoid of ethics Westerners proclaiming to be for “freedom and democracy” in every country they have set foot to ruin and destroy? Take a look at what the US and capitalism have done to Latin American – the profound malaise, the gangs, the drugs, the murders, the poverty, the sexual abuse, the disease epidemics – for millions, it’s hell on earth.
Regarding one of your questions, I came across this tid bit in the media: En su web, la banda reveló: “Este evento está siendo posible gracias a la beneficencia de la Fundación Bon Intenshon…”. Detrás de esa fundación está el empresario Gregory Elias, promotor de un festival de jazz en Curazao y presidente de United Trust, una importante asesoría del paraíso fiscal caribeño.
Apparently it wasn’t the Stones who paid for their unfortunate visit to Cuba.
Could it be, lordie, lordie, that United Trust is a tax evasion/corruption consultancy? Maybe providing money laundering services as well? The Stones are so trashy they can’t even come to Cuba on a clean ticket… I’m surprised they weren’t sponsored by the Hillary Mafia Foundation…
And United Trust – why does that sound familiar? Ah, yes! United Fruit…
The pests are back!
And next time you want to mention torture, why don’t you mention how the CIA monstrously tortured – yes, go into the details – and murdered thousands of innocent Latin Americans in ways that make Castro look like an altar boy?
Lastly, Mr. Hitchens, I’m sure you will allow this to go through moderation, you who love to go off criticizing those awful repressive regimes where no criticism is allowed by those who control public discussion – lest you be cut from the same cloth?
___________________________
ADDED on March 29, 2016.
As of today, my comment above has remained censored on Peter Hitchens’ blog/Mail on Sunday site.
See, “freedom and democracy” is a system where it’s proponents never allow anyone to debate them in public. Then they point fingers are Putin, Castro, and whoever for repressing criticism…
In response to one more filthy rich Hillary shill, avowing by heaven and earth that the evil witch is honest – these people just spit the lies out like popcorn – my comment was censored.
This may shock you: Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest
And maybe, just maybe Rawstory is now pushing Hildabeast because Sanders keeps showing he has a better chance to beat Trump or Cruz…
_____________________
We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by Raw Story. Find out more.
My comment below couldn’t be posted to this article at the Telegraph:
My comment:
Since Hillary has 30 years of criminal activity with Bill, plus the bribes (“speaker fees and that money-laundering foundation of theirs), plus all of Bill’s sex horror stories, including Epstein’s pedophile island – let’s just hope whoever it is will expose her until November. The rest doesn’t matter, because aside from Sanders, they are all crooks and mass murder neocons. But Sanders has no chance – in part, thanks to low info voters, including those of varied colors, stupid enough to vote for corrupt establishment Hillary
Their message: We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by Telegraph. Find out more.
The Spectator has an article depicting the ignorant-on-psychology approach that some conservatives spouse:
This explains why my comment to the above article was censored:
When you are completely ignorant about treating psychological problems, like the Church often is, and so is the Spectator crowd, you are going spout this non-sense that homosexuals have nothing to treat and should go about their lives with their minds deformed. This creates the problem that every kind of homosexual perversion is normalized in their minds and many will effectively insult and sexually harass others because of their homosexuality, along with worse crimes. The dominant discourse will always be “what a cross LGBTs have to bear”, not “let’s inquire about why they experience all kinds of perverted sexual feelings towards people of the same sex”. People who are ignorant about human psychology simply cannot answer or investigate the question. Hence the idiotic stance that results from these conservatives.
________________
Last but not least, I know I’m not the only one, but sometimes, when I read such aberrant articles, I feel like the only person who realizes that these so-called Christian/Catholics interpret the Bible any way they want, and then say the Bible is the word of God – and so it must be true. It would be nice to tap on their shoulder and ask, ‘Haven’t you noticed that every century you have changed the discourse and every time you still proclaim your version is the “word of God”? Cute game, isn’t it?’
This is particularly true of this “we can’t turn away the gays because I love them so much and they’re so nice to me” crowd like Hitchens. “I must have them so near to me in my heart, because I’m such a good little Catholic. And tell me once again how beautiful homosexuality is, Shaw, how utterly nice homosexuals are. It makes me drool. I really want to know how another man would worship me, how he struggles with it, how he’d like to be best friends with me forever. It’s not an abomination at all – who could ever think that, Shaw? I’m just doing my Catholic duty to be good here.”
Really, with “Catholics” like this, who needs GLAAD?
CENSORED: my comment about article on porn on Ethika Politika “Arrested Development: The Destruction Of Masculinity In A Pornified Culture” by Octavia Ratiu | October 23, 2014
The CENSORED comment:
I very much appreciate and support EP’s continued articles to criticize porn. Well done.
My comment to this article, which has many good points, and we need more of, is that it’s too focused on a narrow construct (male viewer/female sex object). Porn poisons the brain and psychology of women just as it does for men. Also, there was no mention of homosexual porn and other perverse kinds of sexuality. I have no doubt that porn reinforces for quite a bit of women who have a heterosexual psychology, along with other factors, a perverted way of thinking about women due to porn. That is, they receive varied messages that thinking of women sexually is acceptable, desirable, and tiltillating – the normalization of homosexuality and bisexuality. Thus they end up gazing at women in porn in the same top-down exploitative position that male viewers of porn are in.
For many women, who have long lost or never had a psychology of respect and dignity, but are much more involved in dynamics of power regarding sexuality, porn is the kind of content that gives them a green light to sexually harass or make unwanted advances towards other women to pursue in the real world what they like to see on screen. And where have you ever seen a homosexual man railing against porn and homosexuals involved in porn? One more piece of evidence of what garbage of people LGBTs are.
======================
AT the time the scandal broke (so around Sept 2014), I read and commented about the scandal at several sites. NRO was one of them. They deleted (censored) all my comments. Here are the comments copied from disqus, which doesn’t post the exact date of the comment, but the date relevant to today (stupid way of doing it!):
A point made by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph:
“Two years ago I reported on how Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for
Rochdale, disclosed in the Commons something of the horrors that had
been going on in his constituency, where social workers had encouraged
the mass-rape of underage girls in “care”, on the grounds that it was
merely their “life choice” to become prostitutes.”
At 11, 12, and 13 years of age! Having come from broken homes and
de-stabilizing environments, and all sorts of abusive histories.
These workers are the same garbage of people who think homosexuality,
pornography, and loveless sex is normal and who want to shove this
horrendous liberal ideology down everyone’s throats. And who now control
most social work and psychology/psychiatric institutions. They are
corrupt to the core. It is a disgrace how degenerate and smug and snotty
they have become at the same time.
And let us not forget England’s favorite homosexual pedophile activist, Peter Tatchell, who has fervently campaigned,
along with all his other monstrous homosexual and liberal pals, for
lowering the age of consent laws in the UK to 14, before they eliminate
limits all together. And why? Because he says that’s “how society will protect children from abuse.“
Look at what this liberal discourse has done to lives of hundreds of
children: it’s profoundly contributed to and often ensured their
neglect, their abandonment by workers and police when they were being
terrorized, exploited, and abused, who dismissed it all as these kids
making “choices” and having greater “sexual freedom.”
What kind of a society even listens to such a grotesque individual as
Tatchell? Why isn’t he branded and shunned for what he truly is? A
vile, homosexual pedophile piece of crap.
===========
Which ones did you assume to be poor Pakis teaching in England’s most elit prep schools 30 years ago? Just curious.
===================
A point made by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph: “Two years ago I
reported on how Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale, disclosed in
the Commons something of the horrors that had been going on in his
constituency, where social workers had encouraged the mass-rape of
underage girls in “care”, on the grounds that it was merely their “life
choice” to become prostitutes.”
At 11, 12, and 13 years of age!
Having come from broken homes and de-stabilizing environments, and all
sorts of abusive histories.
These workers are the same garbage
of people who think homosexuality, pornography, and loveless sex is
normal and who want to shove this horrendous liberal ideology down
everyone’s throats. And who now control most social work and
psychology/psychiatric institutions. They are corrupt to the core. It is
a disgrace how degenerate and smug and snotty they have become at the same time.
And let us not forget England’s favorite homosexual pedophile activist,
A point made by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph:
“Two years ago I reported on how Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for
Rochdale, disclosed in the Commons something of the horrors that had
been going on in his constituency, where social workers had encouraged
the mass-rape of underage girls in “care”, on the grounds that it was
merely their “life choice” to become prostitutes.”
At 11, 12, and 13 years of age! Having come from broken homes and
de-stabilizing environments, and all sorts of abusive histories.
These workers are the same garbage of people who think homosexuality,
pornography, and loveless sex is normal and who want to shove this
horrendous liberal ideology down everyone’s throats. And who now control
most social work and psychology/psychiatric institutions. They are
corrupt to the core. It is a disgrace how degenerate and smug and snotty
they have become at the same time.
If there is one major lesson that everyone needs to take from the
Rotherham scandal, it is this one. The most essential action for anyone
working on a report on child exploitation or abuse is to keep copies of
your work away from your office and home.
In that case, should anyone try to raid either one and take away or destroy evidence, transcripts, reports, drafts, etc., you have your copies safely stored.
“In 2002 high profile personnel at Rotherham Council ordered a raid on
Risky Business, Rotherham council’s specialist youth service, which
offered one-to-one help and support to vulnerable teenage girls, ahead
of the findings of a draft report, according to the Times. The raid was to
remove case files and wipe computer records detailing the scale and
severity of the town’s sex-grooming crisis, sources told The Times.”
Imagine if this social worker had done this in 2002! I’m not blaming her,
because it’s clear she hadn’t the faintest clue she was working in a
vile, corrupt system. She was doing her work properly – that is, if she
had been working in a clean organization. She was so naive. How sad.
The media has also reported three reports were made, and one was suppressed
and two ignored. And what did the people authoring the report do, I
ask?
I mean, if their superiors steal their data and destroy it, that’s one thing, it’s
gone. But if they simply suppress the report, meaning shelf it, then the
social worker simply forgets about the issue as well? Have they never
heard of whistle blowing? Going to politicians, charities, the media?
I’m sorry, but it seems such a social worker is more interested in their
career than in the safe guarding of children. What disgusting people.
==================
A point made by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph:
“Two years ago I reported on how Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for
Rochdale, disclosed in the Commons something of the horrors that had
been going on in his constituency, where social workers had encouraged
the mass-rape of underage girls in “care”, on the grounds that it was
merely their “life choice” to become prostitutes.”
At 11, 12, and 13 years of age! Having come from broken homes and
de-stabilizing environments, and all sorts of abusive histories.
These workers are the same garbage of people who think homosexuality,
pornography, and loveless sex is normal and who want to shove this
horrendous liberal ideology down everyone’s throats. And who now control
most social work and psychology/psychiatric institutions. They are
corrupt to the core. It is a disgrace how degenerate and smug and snotty
they have become at the same time.
Why doesn’t the public in England put pressure on its politicians to take harsh action in this matter?
Laws can be changed (as in mandatory reporting, safeguarding for
whistle blowers, harsher penalties for abusers, building shelters and
special police departments for abuse victims, etc), many more direct
perpetrators could go to prison if re-investigations were done, and all the politicians, police, and care workers who somehow covered up or colluded with the perpetrators could also go to prison.
And even if the current English law structure doesn’t allow for the
imprisonment of civil servants – and what kind of a country is England
if that is the case ? – than at least these people could remain
unemployed for the rest of their lives and shunned from society – as
their punishment for willingly cooperating in the abuse and destruction
of countless, vulnerable young lives.
There is a lot that could be done legally, politically, and socially –
but it seems that England is so corrupt that no one stands up for
anything, even in the face of what is most evil about the country.
=============
I just went to post a comment at TSLT and I got a message. I have been completely censored by the Salt Lake Tribune. Thought crime? I would guess non-PC speech crime of the first degree.
Here’s the comment I couldn’t post:
Alessandra Reflections blog – my latest post that reveals the little reported fact in the media on Mozillagate: it was a vindictive homosexual couple (Hampton and Michael from rarebit) that started the witch hunt against Eich. Hampton wanted to bring Eich down because he wrongly blames Eich for not being able to let him start a business with his homosexual partner. It’s not only very, very personal, but very much about money, money.
Hampton just spinned a ridiculous woe story trying to blame Eich for all the problems in his life. It’s clueless, it’s vindictive, and it’s nasty.
=========================
And here’s another one:
We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by Mercury News.
=========================
And: http://thewilderness.me/mobzilla/
CENSORED: Very nice article. Any person with an ounce of a brain is appalled at what happened here. The good this is that this episode clearly showed the true ugly colors of LGBTs who want to normalize homosexuality. They are a mafia and they won’t stop with Eich. Especially because many social conservatives never react against them.
=========================
We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by Raw Story.
=========================
Discussion on 
Censored at First Things - First Thoughts (this blog has been discontinued - Aug 2018) 